Examination regulations

Examination and Assessment Regulations

Amsterdam Data Academy
Version 2.0 — March 2026
Approved by: Amsterdam Data Academy Management & Examination Committee


1. Purpose

These Examination and Assessment Regulations describe how assessments, examinations, exemptions and progression decisions are organised at Amsterdam Data Academy. They ensure transparency, fairness, and alignment with the published learning outcomes as described in the programme study guide.

These regulations apply to all learners enrolled in courses and bootcamps offered by Amsterdam Data Academy, including the B11 — Applied AI & Datascience full programme.

2. Scope

These regulations apply to all programmes, including but not limited to:

CodeProgrammeType
B11Applied AI & DatascienceFull programme
B01Datascience & PythonBootcamp
B02Gegevens en analyseBootcamp
B03Data Professional (Analytics & Datascience)Bootcamp
B04GegevensbeheerBootcamp
B05AI-engineeringBootcamp
B06Data Expert (Datascience & Data Engineering)Bootcamp
B07Applied AI for Business ProfessionalsBootcamp
B08AI Professional (Applied AI & AI Engineering)Bootcamp

Programme-specific details such as learning outcomes, duration and assessment formats are described in the relevant study guides.

3. Assessment Principles

Assessments at Amsterdam Data Academy are designed according to the following principles:

  • All assessments are aligned with published learning outcomes
  • Assessment methods are valid, reliable and transparent
  • Learners are assessed on knowledge, skills and professional application
  • Assessment criteria and rubrics are communicated in advance via the learning platform
  • Assessments are designed to support learning as well as evaluation

4. Forms of Assessment

Depending on the programme, assessment may include one or more of the following:

  • Practical assignments — real-world business cases or technical projects (e.g. Jupyter notebooks, dashboards, architecture reports)
  • Case studies — applied analysis of a concrete business scenario
  • Presentations — live or recorded delivery (max 10 slides or 3-minute demo)
  • Final assignments — integrated capstone projects per bootcamp track
  • Internship report & presentation — including written report, stakeholder presentation and supervisor evaluation

The assessment structure and weighting per programme are described in the study guide and assessment matrix.

5. Grading and Passing Criteria (Cesuur)

Every module is assessed using a 4-point rubric scale across weighted criteria, producing a score out of 300 points.

ScoreLabelPercentageResult
3 · GoodPass with Distinction≥ 85% (≥ 255/300)Excellent
2 · SufficientPass55–84% (165–254)Diploma eligible
1 · Needs WorkResubmission35–54% (105–164)One resit allowed
0 · InsufficientFail< 35% (< 105)Module resit required

Passing threshold (cesuur): A score of ≥ 165 out of 300 points (55%) is required to pass each module assessment. A score of ≥ 210/300 (70%) qualifies as Good; ≥ 255/300 (85%) qualifies as Excellent.

The detailed assessment rubrics per bootcamp — including all criteria, weights, and descriptions per score level — are published in a separate document: https://amsterdamdataacademy.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/ADA_Assessment_Rubrics.pdf

Diploma requirements (B11 programme):

  • Achieve Sufficient (≥ 165/300) on all module assessments
  • Achieve Sufficient on all five Final Assignments (A51–A55)
  • Complete the internship with minimum Sufficient on all criteria
  • Attend minimum 80% of live sessions
  • Submit all portfolio items by stated deadlines

Diploma with Distinction (Cum Laude): Learners achieving Good on the internship AND at least 3 track Final Assignments receive the diploma cum laude.

6. Four-Eyes Principle

Amsterdam Data Academy applies a mandatory four-eyes principle (vier-ogenbeginsel) for all assessments. Every module has a designated teacher (begeleider) and an independent examiner (examinator). The teacher guides learning; the examiner assesses independently. This two-person principle is structurally embedded in our curriculum management system and applies to every module and final assignment.

The Examination Committee oversees the examination process and ensures quality and consistency across all assessments.

7. Resits and Retakes

  • Learners scoring 1 (Needs Improvement) receive one resit opportunity per module. Resit assignments are new versions of the original task at equivalent difficulty.
  • The examiner for the resit is independent of the original assessment.
  • Learners scoring 0 (Insufficient) on a Final Assignment must repeat the full track.
  • For the internship, a structured improvement assignment is offered after an insufficient evaluation.

8. Final Projects and Practical Assignments

Each bootcamp track concludes with a Final Assignment — an integrated case project demonstrating mastery. The B11 programme uses the Vivino case as a consistent real-world business context across all five tracks, progressing from analytics dashboards (Track 1) to a production-grade RAG AI sommelier (Track 5).

Final projects are assessed using a detailed rubric and reviewed by two assessors (four-eyes principle).

9. Exemptions and Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL)

9.1 General principle

Amsterdam Data Academy recognises that learners may already possess relevant knowledge or skills through prior education or professional experience. Exemptions may be granted when prior learning demonstrably covers the same learning outcomes as (part of) a programme.

9.2 Programme-based exemptions

  • Learners who have completed B02 (Data & Analytics) of B05 (AI Engineering) may receive exemptions for corresponding tracks within the B11 full programme
  • Learners who have completed B01 (Datascience & Python) of B04 (Data Engineering) may receive exemptions within the B06 (Data Expert) programme
  • Learners who have completed B05 (AI Engineering) of B07 (Applied AI) may receive exemptions for up to 50% of the B08 (AI Professional) programme

9.3 Entry based on professional experience

Learners with demonstrable professional experience may be admitted directly into Data Engineering or AI Engineering programmes. Decisions are based on documented evidence such as CVs, portfolios, certificates and interviews.

9.4 Exemption procedure

  • Requests for exemptions must be submitted before the start of the programme
  • Requests must include supporting documentation
  • The Examination Committee evaluates each request individually
  • Decisions are communicated in writing prior to enrolment

10. Examination Committee

Amsterdam Data Academy appoints an independent Examination Committee responsible for safeguarding assessment quality, reviewing exemption requests, monitoring grading consistency, and handling assessment-related disputes.

All members operate independently — without financial or managerial responsibility at ADA. The committee meets at least four times per year and decides by majority vote.

Michelle Brand

Michelle Brand

Chair (External)

Founder, Brand New Learning. Specialist in learning design, quality assurance and educational programme development.

LinkedIn →

Rob Stroober

Rob Stroober

Member (External)

Lecturer in Computer Science at the Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (HvA). Expert in ICT education and curriculum design.

LinkedIn →

Ákos Steger

Ákos Steger

Member (Internal)

Data Scientist and AI instructor at Amsterdam Data Academy. Specialist in language technologies, NLP and RAG applications. Over a decade of teaching experience.

LinkedIn →

11. Complaints, Objections and Appeals

Amsterdam Data Academy maintains two separate procedures:

Procedure 1 — Complaints and disputes (service, organisation, guidance)

  1. The learner discusses the complaint with the instructor or programme coordinator.
  2. If unresolved, the learner may escalate in writing to ADA management. Management responds in writing within four weeks.
  3. If not resolved after internal handling, the learner may escalate to the independent NRTO Dispute Committee (external, binding). Details: nrto.nl/geschillencommissie

Procedure 2 — Objections and appeals (examination decisions)

  1. Learners who disagree with an assessment decision may submit a written objection to the Examination Committee within 10 working days. The committee reconsiders and responds in writing within 4 weeks.
  2. If the objection is not resolved satisfactorily, the learner may appeal to ADA’s independent Appeals Committee (Commissie van Beroep):

    • Eveline de Beer — Chair (external). Advocaat, gespecialiseerd in arbeidsrecht en sociaal zekerheidsrecht. Werkzaam bij Snijders Advocaten. — LinkedIn

    • Patrick van Dolder — Member (external). Business Controller bij DMP (Broad Horizon groep). — LinkedIn
  3. The Appeals Committee convenes within 4 weeks and issues a binding decision within 6 weeks.

The full complaints procedure is published at: amsterdamdataacademy.com/complaint-procedure/

12. Separation of Teaching and Examination

Amsterdam Data Academy ensures the independence and objectivity of the examination process through a clear separation between teaching, administering and grading:

  • Teaching: Instructors deliver the programme and guide learners, but do not independently assess their own candidates
  • Administering: Assessments are submitted digitally via the learning platform (LearnDash). The platform records results automatically, preventing any interference
  • Grading: Assessments are reviewed by at least two assessors (four-eyes principle). At least one assessor is independent of the module. All grades are recorded in the platform and are auditable by the Examination Committee
  • Quality assurance: The Examination Committee formally approves all rubrics, assessment criteria and final results. The committee operates independently of programme delivery

13. Validity of Results

Module results are valid for a maximum of 3 years within the programme. After this period, the Examination Committee may require a new assessment.

14. Fraud and Irregularities

In cases of fraud or plagiarism, the Examination Committee may invalidate results. Serious cases may lead to exclusion from the programme.

15. Diploma and Certification

The programme is successfully completed when all module assessments, final assignments and the internship have been passed. The Examination Committee formally decides on diploma award. The diploma is signed by the Chair of the Examination Committee.

The B11 — Applied AI & Datascience programme has been submitted for NLQF Level 6 classification (bachelor equivalent). Upon classification, the programme will be eligible for the SLIM-scholingssubsidie (40% employer subsidy).

16. Continuity Guarantee

In the event Amsterdam Data Academy discontinues a programme, learners are guaranteed to complete their track within 12 months via ADA’s own teaching team under supervision of the Examination Committee, and/or via a designated partner institution.

17. Accreditation & Quality Marks

  • CRKBO — Central Register Short Vocational Education (VAT-exempt status)
  • NRTO — Dutch association for training institutions (quality keurmerk)
  • CPION — Independent audit body (annual quality audit, December 2025: no findings)
  • NLQF Level 6 — classification submitted (bachelor equivalent, pending)

18. Publication and Updates

  • These Examination and Assessment Regulations are published on the Amsterdam Data Academy website
  • Learners receive access to these regulations at the start of their programme via the learning platform
  • The complete quality handbook (ADA Instructor Excellence Guide) is available to instructors and examiners
  • Updates are versioned and communicated transparently

Amsterdam Data Academy · Science Park 400, 1098 XH Amsterdam · 085 004 9642
CRKBO-registered · NRTO-certified · KvK: 90490592

Scroll naar boven

Studieadvies nodig?

Als je geïnteresseerd bent in een van onze cursussen maar niet zeker weet welk programma het beste bij je past, plan dan een gratis adviesgesprek met onze studieadviseur. Wij helpen je de volgende stap in je carrière te zetten.

Olivier van Hees